On the demand side, exporters and strategic planners focusing on antiques over 100 years old in the United States face a number of questions. Which countries are supplying antiques over 100 years old to the United States? How important is the United States compared to others in terms of the entire global and regional market? How much do the imports of antiques over 100 years old vary from one country of origin to another in the United States? On the supply side, the United States also exports antiques over 100 years old. Which countries receive the most exports from the United States? How are these exports concentrated across buyers? What is the value of these exports and which countries are the largest buyers?

This report was created for strategic planners, international marketing executives, and import/export managers who are concerned with the market for antiques over 100 years old in the United States. With the globalization of this market, managers can no longer be contented with a local view. Nor can managers be contented with out-of-date statistics which appear several years after the fact. Professor Philip M. Parker, the Chair Professor of Management Science at INSEAD, has developed a methodology, based on macroeconomic and trade models, to estimate the market for antiques over 100 years old for those countries serving the United States via exports, or supplying from the United States via imports. He does so for the current year based on a variety of key historical indicators and econometric models.

"Antiques over 100 years old" as a category is defined in this report following the definition given by the United Nations Statistics Division Classification Registry using the Standard International Trade Classification, Revision 3 (SITC, Rev. 3). The SITC code that defines "antiques over 100 years old" is 8966.

On the demand side, exporters and strategic planners focusing on antiques over 100 years old in the United States face a number of questions. Which countries are supplying antiques over 100 years old to the United States? How important is the United States compared to others in terms of the entire global and regional market? How much do the imports of antiques over 100 years old vary from one country of origin to another in the United States? On the supply side, the United States also exports antiques over 100 years old. Which countries receive the most exports from the United States? How are these exports concentrated across buyers? What is the value of these exports and which countries are the largest buyers?

This report was created for strategic planners, international marketing executives, and import/export managers who are concerned with the market for antiques over 100 years old in the United States. With the globalization of this market, managers can no longer be contented with a local view. Nor can managers be contented with out-of-date statistics which appear several years after the fact. Professor Philip M. Parker, the Chair Professor of Management Science at INSEAD, has developed a methodology, based on macroeconomic and trade models, to estimate the market for antiques over 100 years old for those countries serving the United States via exports, or supplying from the United States via imports. He does so for the current year based on a variety of key historical indicators and econometric models.

In what follows, Chapter 2 begins by summarizing where the United States fits into the world market for imported and exported antiques over 100 years old. The total level of imports and exports on a worldwide basis, and those for the United States in particular, is estimated using a model which aggregates across over 150 key country markets and projects these to the current year. From there, each country represents a percent of the world market. This market is served from a number of competitive countries of origin. Based on both demand- and supply-side dynamics, market shares by country of origin are then calculated across each country market destination. These shares lead to a volume of import and export values for each country and are aggregated to regional and world totals. In doing so, we are able to obtain maximum likelihood estimates of both the value of each market and the share that the United States is likely to receive this year. From these figures, rankings are calculated to allow managers to prioritize the United States compared to other major country markets. In this way, all the figures provided in this report are forecasts that can be combined with internal information sources for strategic planning purposes.

After the worldwide summary in Chapter 2 of both imports and exports of antiques over 100 years old, Chapter 3 goes into detail on imports, but for each major country of origin serving the United States. A "major" market is defined as a country where the United States represents a substantially large share of either imports or exports. For each major country exporting to the United States, one can thus observe how important the United States is to that exporting country compared to other countries of the world. Chapter 4 does the same, but for exports of antiques over 100 years old originating from the United States, for each major country of destination. In doing so, one can discover the share that the United States has in each major market; this share value is often used as a measure of competitiveness for the United States. In all cases, the total dollar volume and percentage share values by major trading partner are provided. Combined, Chapters 3 and 4 present the total picture for imports and exports of antiques over 100 years old to and from the United States and all other major countries in the world. "Antiques over 100 years old" as a category is defined in this report following the definition given by the United Nations Statistics Division Classification Registry using the Standard International Trade Classification, Revision 3 (SITC, Rev. 3). The SITC code that defines "antiques over 100 years old" is 8966.

Important Caveat: The figures should be seen as market estimates, as opposed to historical records, as these are forecasted for the current year of trade. More importantly, in light of the fact that unforeseeable factors might interrupt markets in achieving their reported levels, the figures should be seen as estimates of potential. For example, "mad cow" disease, foot-and-mouth disease, trade embargoes, military conflicts, acts of terrorism, and other events will certainly affect the actual trade flows recorded for a variety of industry or product categories. In such cases, the difference between the numbers given in this report and the numbers actually observed might be interpreted as the "net loss" or "net gain" due to these exogenous events affecting regular trade flows that would have occurred had these events not have taken place.

• 1INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY
• 2THE UNITED STATES AND THE WORLD MARKET
• 2.1IMPORTS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 2021
• 2.2EXPORTS FROM THE UNITED STATES IN 2021
• 3IMPORTS IN THE UNITED STATES
• 3.1AFRICA
• 3.1.1ALGERIA
• 3.1.2ANGOLA
• 3.1.3BENIN
• 3.1.4BURKINA FASO
• 3.1.5CAMEROON
• 3.1.6COTE D'IVOIRE
• 3.1.7EGYPT
• 3.1.8ESWATINI
• 3.1.9ETHIOPIA
• 3.1.10GABON
• 3.1.11GHANA
• 3.1.12GUINEA
• 3.1.13GUINEA-BISSAU
• 3.1.14KENYA
• 3.1.15LIBERIA
• 3.1.16MADAGASCAR
• 3.1.17MALI
• 3.1.18MOROCCO
• 3.1.19NAMIBIA
• 3.1.20NIGERIA
• 3.1.21SIERRA LEONE
• 3.1.22SOUTH AFRICA
• 3.1.23TANZANIA
• 3.1.24THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
• 3.1.25THE REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
• 3.1.26TUNISIA
• 3.1.27ZAMBIA
• 3.2ASIA
• 3.2.1CAMBODIA
• 3.2.2CHINA
• 3.2.3HONG KONG
• 3.2.4INDIA
• 3.2.5INDONESIA
• 3.2.6JAPAN
• 3.2.7LAOS
• 3.2.8MACAU
• 3.2.9MALAYSIA
• 3.2.10MONGOLIA
• 3.2.11MYANMAR
• 3.2.12NEPAL
• 3.2.13PAPUA NEW GUINEA
• 3.2.14PHILIPPINES
• 3.2.15SINGAPORE
• 3.2.16SOUTH KOREA
• 3.2.17SRI LANKA
• 3.2.18TAIWAN
• 3.2.19THAILAND
• 3.2.20VIETNAM
• 3.3EUROPE
• 3.3.1ALBANIA
• 3.3.2AUSTRIA
• 3.3.3BELGIUM
• 3.3.4BULGARIA
• 3.3.5CYPRUS
• 3.3.6DENMARK
• 3.3.7FINLAND
• 3.3.8FRANCE
• 3.3.9GEORGIA
• 3.3.10GERMANY
• 3.3.11GREECE
• 3.3.12HUNGARY
• 3.3.13IRELAND
• 3.3.14ITALY
• 3.3.15KAZAKHSTAN
• 3.3.16LITHUANIA
• 3.3.17LUXEMBOURG
• 3.3.18MACEDONIA
• 3.3.19MALTA
• 3.3.20NORWAY
• 3.3.21POLAND
• 3.3.22PORTUGAL
• 3.3.23ROMANIA
• 3.3.24RUSSIA
• 3.3.25SLOVAKIA
• 3.3.26SPAIN
• 3.3.27SWEDEN
• 3.3.28SWITZERLAND
• 3.3.29THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• 3.3.30THE NETHERLANDS
• 3.3.31THE UNITED KINGDOM
• 3.3.32UKRAINE
• 3.4LATIN AMERICA
• 3.4.1ARGENTINA
• 3.4.2BOLIVIA
• 3.4.3BRAZIL
• 3.4.4CHILE
• 3.4.5COLOMBIA
• 3.4.6COSTA RICA
• 3.4.7HONDURAS
• 3.4.8MEXICO
• 3.4.9PERU
• 3.4.10URUGUAY
• 3.5NORTH AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN
• 3.5.1CANADA
• 3.5.2JAMAICA
• 3.5.3THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
• 3.6OCEANIA
• 3.6.1AUSTRALIA
• 3.6.2FIJI
• 3.6.3FRENCH POLYNESIA
• 3.6.4NEW CALEDONIA
• 3.6.5NEW ZEALAND
• 3.6.6SOLOMON ISLANDS
• 3.6.7TONGA
• 3.6.8VANUATU
• 3.7THE MIDDLE EAST
• 3.7.1AFGHANISTAN
• 3.7.2ARMENIA
• 3.7.3AZERBAIJAN
• 3.7.4BAHRAIN
• 3.7.5IRAQ
• 3.7.6ISRAEL
• 3.7.7JORDAN
• 3.7.8KUWAIT
• 3.7.9LEBANON
• 3.7.10PAKISTAN
• 3.7.11SAUDI ARABIA
• 3.7.12SYRIA
• 3.7.13THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
• 3.7.14TURKEY
• 3.7.15TURKMENISTAN
• 3.7.16UZBEKISTAN
• 3.7.17YEMEN
• 4EXPORTS FROM THE UNITED STATES
• 4.1AFRICA
• 4.1.1SOUTH AFRICA
• 4.2ASIA
• 4.2.1CHINA
• 4.2.2HONG KONG
• 4.2.3INDIA
• 4.2.4JAPAN
• 4.2.5MACAU
• 4.2.6MALAYSIA
• 4.2.7SINGAPORE
• 4.2.8SOUTH KOREA
• 4.2.9TAIWAN
• 4.3EUROPE
• 4.3.1AUSTRIA
• 4.3.2BELGIUM
• 4.3.3CYPRUS
• 4.3.4DENMARK
• 4.3.5FINLAND
• 4.3.6FRANCE
• 4.3.7GERMANY
• 4.3.8HUNGARY
• 4.3.9IRELAND
• 4.3.10ITALY
• 4.3.11LATVIA
• 4.3.12LITHUANIA
• 4.3.13LUXEMBOURG
• 4.3.14MALTA
• 4.3.15NORWAY
• 4.3.16POLAND
• 4.3.17PORTUGAL
• 4.3.18SPAIN
• 4.3.19SWEDEN
• 4.3.20SWITZERLAND
• 4.3.21THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• 4.3.22THE NETHERLANDS
• 4.3.23THE UNITED KINGDOM
• 4.3.24UKRAINE
• 4.4LATIN AMERICA
• 4.4.1BRAZIL
• 4.4.2CHILE
• 4.4.3MEXICO
• 4.4.4PARAGUAY
• 4.5NORTH AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN
• 4.5.1BERMUDA
• 4.5.2CANADA
• 4.5.3THE BAHAMAS
• 4.6OCEANIA
• 4.6.1AUSTRALIA
• 4.6.2NEW ZEALAND
• 4.7THE MIDDLE EAST
• 4.7.1ISRAEL
• 4.7.2QATAR
• 4.7.3TURKEY
• 5DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTIES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS
• 5.1DISCLAIMERS & SAFE HARBOR
• 5.2ICON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS